I'm not sure, but I think I remember hearing William Forsythe say in an
interview that economic realities at least in part led him to his ideas
for Choreographic Objects. Any institution can commission one of his
installations - installations which do not require extensive rehearsal
time, dancers' payments or theatre, lighting, sound or travel expenses,
etc. Referring back to my post on Miwon Kwon's book, William
Forsythe's installations seem to be precisely what Kwon is troubled by.
The installations go up from institution to institution making both
them and Forsythe money with seemingly no concern for any enduring
relationship to the site or the community. For me, however, I see
Forsythe's installations as a possible answer to Kwon's call for a
process of double-mediation.
For example, the effect of "Scattered
Crowd," an installation with sound and 4000 balloons, is to create an
ecological space where the physical environment and the "organisms" in
it are in relationship. To use Richard Serra's words (ironically
enough) to help describe Forsythe's: "The works become at part of the site and
restructure both conceptually and perceptually the organization of the
site." So, though Forsythe's installations are not tied to the site in a
traditional sense, I feel that the space and the work are
co-constitutive, and because of that, though the installation can be
reproduced elsewhere, it can never be reproduced exactly. The work
creates an ecology specific to that location alone.
When I look at the
pictures below of "Scattered Crowd" I can imagine that if I had been
part of it, something of the experience would have remained long after
the installation was taken down and that the space itself would have
been indelibly changed for me.
-Alicia Laumann
No comments:
Post a Comment